As a writer with lots of business-to-business experience, I understand
the importance of turning tradespeak into plain talk. I also understand
that talking the "good talk" can make a reader feel at home.
But coining new words that are neither plain talk nor helpful jargon is simply
awkward.
"Copywrite" is
simply not the language of our trade. I'm not a fan of needless jargon. The simple word "write" will serve fine. But if we're going to use advertising lingo,
let's get it right. Using tradespeak incorrectly immediately shows you're
an outsider. In my decades' experience
in the ad biz, no creative director ever assigned me to "copy write"
something, let alone have I ever written "copywrite."
"Copywrite"
as a verb is not in any of the dictionaries at Dictionary.com.
This includes the notoriously liberal Merriam Webster's, and my favorite,
American Heritage. In the "reference" link, it is shown
as various trademarks, and as an improper substitute for other words,
such as "copywriting." In any case, it is not shown
as a verb.
As
a noun, it is explicitly rejected. And although a discussion under
"copywritten"
does say "copywrite" is "sometimes used [as a verb]
by professionals," this professional of 30 years' experience
has never heard it where it didn't expose the speaker's industry naοvetι.
Sometimes
the English language simply doesn't take the path you might expect.
For good reason. There is a significant difference
between a man well-hanged and a man well-hung. If a plane flies into
your air space and then departs, we say it "flew
out," but if a baseball player hits a fly ball that is caught,
he "flied out." That's just the way it is.
Does
a sign painter "signpaint"? Does a bricklayer "bricklay"?
No, they don't. And a copywriter doesn't "copywrite."
I'll
grant, it's not totally logical, but when you view the copywriting
in someone's portfolio, be assured it was not "copywritten."
Good
copywriters say it shorter. I have nothing
against long copy (obviously), or long words. But I do object to using more
words or longer words than necessary. Every authority agrees from leading
creative directors to your
high school English teacher. "Copywriting" as a verb
says nothing that "writing" doesn't say. (Watch for my upcoming
article Use vs. Utilize,
followed by a third in this series, Coming vs. Upcoming.)
Silliness
and nitpicking aside, it is the wrong frame of mind. A good copywriter should
never set out to "copywrite." That would
suggest a process that is somehow different from other writing somehow artful, "addy," hyped, dumbed down,
sugar coated, normalized, or whatever.
That's
exactly opposite to what good copywriting should be. Good copywriting
should be transparent. Advertising Copywriters should simply "write." We might
use any of the tools other writers use, and work in any of the genres
other writers work in. There are some tools we tend to employ more often
(e.g. short paragraphs, bullets, incomplete sentences, plain language),
but whether we're creating a trust-building, down-home tone, or generating "killer
copy," the last thing it should feel like is "copywriting."
If you must use a long form, make it "personal communication."
Whatever you choose to call your text or script, call 718-577-0005 or write
me to discuss your copywriting needs in detail.
copyright ©2009 Randall Rensch All Rights Reserved